Search for: "People v. Scott (2002)"
Results 41 - 60
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm
A $2,250 tuition voucher (the amount involved in the court’s 2002 decision in Zelman v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:25 am
Most of my new book The Grasping Hand, focuses on the broader legal and political issues raised by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Scott, 177 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1999), and subsequently left undecided in Gilbert v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
In an April 27, 2010 post titled, `The Dog Grifters: Donna Roberts and Dawn Abrams Strike Again,’ defendant wondered how `these despicable human beings’ `think that they can continue to get away with ripping people off . . . [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
All of that was pretty standard stuff - based on R(A) v Lambeth - but a pretty innovative argument was addressed to the CA that previous cases on this point did not take account of the changes introduced in the Homelessness Act 2002. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Jan. 10, 2002) (substance abuse); Barasch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:25 am
Her organization, NFIB, was involved in litigation against the Affordable Care Act, in NFIB v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:49 am
The plaintiff had begun taking Zometa in 2002 for lymphoma. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Subsequently, in Scott v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Volkswagen of America, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 574, 576-77 (N.Y. 2002); Barker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
That conclusion had “the effect of completely overturning the reasoning of the Court of Appeal [in Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45; [2002] Fam 261] which carved out an exception to the general rule concerning the reportability of proceedings heard in private”: Xanthopoulos at [116]. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Alcon (Pantopaque), 2002 WL 34201763 Deposition2002-08-13 Parker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Scott Sia worked on the brief. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
