Search for: "People v. Sewell"
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
An Empirical Observation and Analysis of the Effects of the Serious Harm Requirement in Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013, Charlie Sewell, Inde [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
There is no doubt, however, that the UK Parliament has the power to make arrangements for referendums anywhere within the UK on such issues as it wishes to consult the people on. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Its domineering chairman and CEO, Sewell L. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm
In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and it must carry a meaning that “[substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the claimant], or has a tendency to do so” (see Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
(Reviewing John Sewell, The Shape of the Suburbs: Understanding Toronto’s Sprawl.) 6 Fla. [read post]
