Search for: "People v. Shock"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
Sudden and Shocking Arrests With Immediate, Irreparable Consequences Buying sex in Texas can get someone arrested without warning, and surprising someone who has never before had any trouble with the law. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
” [9] Para 49: “This war affected more than 2 million people the entire population of Gaza. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am
I would be shocked if Meta didn’t appeal this. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
At its worst, unstable administration wrecks the rule of law and, eventually, people’s respect for government itself. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
She tweeted, amongst other things, that “South Africa has shown moral leadership in bringing its application to the ICJ under the Genocide Convention, to protect the Palestinian people in Gaza. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
The most recent development in the fight over ICWA is Brackeen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
From today's Fifth Circuit decision in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Here is the entire complaint: Kestenbaum v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
Defending Alice The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Anaphylactic shock can result from merely sniffing an offending substance that is otherwise benign or even healthy. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]