Search for: "People v. Smith (1981)"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
In 1981, a recommendation from Rehnquist got Roberts a position in the newly installed Reagan administration, as a special assistant to Attorney General William French Smith. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Representation of the People Act 1918 Mari Takayanagi15. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:44 pm
From solicitor David Smith. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
The parties to a case don’t have the general right to listen to or obtain a copy of the actual recording of a hearing and they are prohibited from making their own unless the judge gives permission (s9 Contempt of Court Act 1981). [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
As the Wall Street Journal reported in December 2017, the amount of surveillance equipment used for every 100,000 people in Xinjiang roughly equals what is used to monitor over a million people in other parts of China. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
After federal courts blocked as unconstitutional Trump’s ban on transgender people serving in the military, and following a memorandum and report submitted by the defense secretary, Trump revoked that memorandum. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
Smith, 101 S.Ct. 1866 (1981) (Defendant held in custody was compelled by the court to submit to a ‘mental status examination’ performed by a court-appointed psychiatrist. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
Later, in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Unit A Feb. 1981)). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
A very interesting decision today from the Iowa Supreme Court, in Bandstra v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:11 pm
In today's Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
Krezdorn, 639 F2d 1327, 1331 (5th Cir. 1981)3 (quoting 22 Charles Alan Wright & Kenneth A. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
The government cannot penalize people for exercising their constitutional rights, and Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Smith, 904 F.2d 112, 116–17 (1st Cir.1990) (quoting Amen, 831 F.2d at 378) (emphasis supplied). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
