Search for: "People v. Stock" Results 41 - 60 of 1,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mark Graber
Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent from a denial of certiorari in Storman’s Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Broc Romanek
California Weighs In From Keith Bishop: The California case of People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
  The evidence, viewed in the light favorable to the conviction, shows that the defendant, Raymond May, (1) was a manager of the marijuana grow operation, (2) slept in a trailer on the property, and (3) possessed an (illegal) AK-47 used to guard the drugs that "had a collapsible stock to make it more compact, a flash suppressor to minimize the explosion from the weapon when fired, a detachable high-capacity magazine holding 30 rounds, and a three-position selector switch [that] .… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
Here is a video showing how the bump stock can be used to simulate a machine gun’s rate of fire: Here is the opinion: Cargill v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:01 pm
. - Don't call Russell Wafer at the Lock, Stock & Barrel in Temple city if you want your sister whacked. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:35 am by Jeralyn
What it does: The amendment would undo a unanimous Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
Vaughn Marshall has written a nice post on Chancellor Chandler's decision in Ryan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:50 am by Eric
Given its stock-in-trade in trashing people, I'm a little surprised we don't have more lawsuits relating to it. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:17 am
Yesterday the First Department dismissed four of six claims against former New York Stock Exchange chairman Richard Grasso finding that former Attorney General Spitzer lacked the authority to bring them (People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990). [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
But inexplicably the company failed to accommodate those requests, causing the impacted individuals to resign.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]