Search for: "People v. Sullivan (1991)" Results 41 - 60 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1991)); but that power of the government to control its own speech is far removed from the government’s attempt in this case to retaliate against businesses for their owners’ speech. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:45 pm
Sullivan and Graham present an opportunity for the Court to affirm the reasoning put forth in Roper v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Oliver Brown fue un personaje secundario, un nombre más entre un grupo de casi doscientos reclamantes que habían sido seleccionados para litigar por la NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), una organización creada en 1909 para promover los derechos de los negros. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
Sullivan, “a classic example of non-originalist interpretation”; and the various “extravagant assertions of congressional power. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
 Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
 The problem, however, is that some people just don’t much like being “n [read post]