Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Commons) (1982)"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
In a motion filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Commercial List on August 11, 2017, the lawyer for Retirees of Sears Canada cited s. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I’m assuming he meant the FDIC, but what do I know, that’s what the court documents said, the FTC. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Some states recognize common-law privileges, others have statutes of widely different breadth, while still others haven't recognized any privilege. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
,Petitioners,v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGECOUNTY,Respondent;AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et al. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
People often think that “marriage” and “family” are synonymous, but these words are not interchangeable in law. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
“This is a court that is reading what people are talking about. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
We are a tolerant people, living in a tolerant country. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
