Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Good)"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Under the UCC, that inventory includes not only the goods the dealer owns, but also includes goods that are on consignment to the dealer.[4] The UCC therefore provides that where a consignor delivered goods to a dealer on consignment, and the dealer subsequently becomes bankrupt, the dealer’s creditors are entitled to sell goods that the dealer owns as well as goods on consignment with the dealer to cover any amounts remaining on outstanding debts. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
On the criminal side, 27% of Superior Court cases nationwide had been open for more than 18 months in 2017-2018. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Jarkesy v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:31 pm
See Navrides v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The offence of abandoning a child is found in Part V of the Criminal Code. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, 51 Cal.3d 674, 687 (Cal. 1990). 10Forman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
People with felony convictions are not eligible to serve. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Who do you think is right in this one; the trial court or the Court of Appeal? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
They undermine meritocracy in much the same way as racial preferences in higher education do, except much more so: The recent Supreme Court case about affirmative action in university admissions (SFFA v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
At the same time, well, you know, sometimes, statutes are ambiguous, and we punish you anyway if you violate what the courts subsequently say is the superior reading of the statute. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Meanwhile, as the Superior Court notes, Campbell lacked the capacity to marry. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
Rappaport's point in his blog is a good dis [read post]
