Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Stevens)" Results 41 - 60 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
6-12-2008 California:This district's Court of Appeal yesterday rejected a man's claim that the state's sex offender registration law violates equal protection by requiring mandatory registration for individuals who engage in oral copulation with a minor, but not for those who engage in sexual intercourse.Affirming Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steven D. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Specifically as to inadequate warning claims the court in Anderson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
” In other news, on Wednesday the Court will hear oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Howard Knopf
LSUC) And even more recent principle as enunciated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To be clear, whether or not Breadberry was negligent, and plaintiff claims Breadberry was negligent, the court concludes that Breadberry’s liability is also vicarious, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 468 (2010). [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the California Court of Appeal – 2d District: Dove v. [read post]