Search for: "People v. Tillman" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Just Security
Rohingya Perspectives on Post-Atrocity Justice by Rebecca Hamilton (@bechamilton) Provision of Healthcare by Islamist Armed Groups: Between Sharia and International Law by Marta Furlan U.N. and Human Rights New UN Special Rapporteur’s Report Underscores Risks of Abusive Counterterrorism by Cyprien Fluzin (@CyprienFluzin) Next UN Afghanistan Talks in Doha Must Hold Taliban to Account on Human Rights by Lisa Curtis (@LisaCurtisDC) Trump Trials The Right to a Unanimous Verdict and the Jury… [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At BuzzFeed News, Zoe Tillman reports that “[f]ive people who disrupted proceedings at the US Supreme Court to protest the Citizens United decision pleaded guilty on Thursday to two misdemeanor charges, one month after losing a constitutional challenge to part of the case. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
And then Posner gave Zoe Tillman an interview, where he cranked it up a notch. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are a lot of prescription drugs out there that people can also use to get high. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
I note how the recorded votes in Missouri v. [read post]