Search for: "People v. Williams (1980)" Results 41 - 60 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Feldstein and Wrobel’s point estimates are somewhat imprecise but broadly indicate a rapid adjustment of gross wages to changes in the progressivity of state and local tax systems in the 1980s. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:34 pm by Josh Blackman
.' The way that Walter Williams did it in one of his books from the 1980s is 'All It Takes Is Guts.' And I think a lot of people lack courage, like they know what is right, and they're scared to death of doing it. [read post]
Further, William Kovacic—a former FTC chair, commissioner, and general counsel—explains that the unanimous Supreme Court opinion in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The 1980 report which created the foundation for FIPPA, the “Public Government for Private People: The Report of the Commission on Freedom of Information and Individual Privacy” (also known as the Williams Commission), explained the reasons for this as follows, If Cabinet discussions were to become a matter of public record, individual ministers would be inhibited from expressing their frank opinions for fear of later being identified as dissidents. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:09 am by Bonnie Shucha
Purposivism was premised on this underlying notion that courts should interpret statutes so as to “carry out the purpose as best they can”… And by the 1980s, many people believed, and this is most prominently, the late Justice Scalia, the purposivism and intentionalism were basically proxies for judges doing whatever the heck they wanted. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  Courts had long adapted common-law rules to “new conditions arising out of modern progress”; now they should recognize that “the upper air is a natural heritage common to all of the people. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm by Aaron Moss
These are apparently go-to accessories for people who don’t have skin. 5. [read post]