Search for: "People v. Young (1981)"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
The case is Jamal Knox v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:22 am
In Rostker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm
In County of Wayne v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
As one Han Chinese man who has lived in Xinjiang for 20 years stated, “Entire villages in Southern Xinjiang have been emptied of young and middle-aged people—all rounded up into ‘re-education’ classes. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 5:15 pm
The murder charge this woman faces is called a “Watson murder,” so named following a California Supreme Court decision in 1981 (People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Hughes’s relationship with Diefenbaker began when Hughes was a young lawyer practicing in Saskatoon. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
We got too many people on probation [for] felonies already, and . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:33 am
Moore v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
We agree that there is sometimes more that can be done to keep (young babies in particular) safe without removal to stranger foster care, while necessary investigations take place; particularly in cases where possible serious non-accidental injuries are being investigated. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
For example, see Greene v Watts (1962) 210 CA2d 103 (young child may not be capable of assumption of risk or contributory negligence in dog-bite case) or the ruling in People v Berry (1991) 1 CA4th 778 (a child under the age five is not legally capable of acting with reasonable care towards a dog). [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:44 pm
Va. 1981)). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:30 am
Perhaps the better question is: Why put young people through this symbolic ritual? [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
I've said some good things recently about good opinions and good people. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981), and the ban on firing ranges that the Seventh Circuit struck down in Ezell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
It is important to note from the outset that, pursuant to section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, reporting restrictions apply regarding the publication of certain facts surrounding R v Jogee, however, this does not extend to academic discussion or law reporting of the Court’s judgment. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
