Search for: "Perry v. State of California" Results 41 - 60 of 786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
In PruneYard, for instance, the Court stressed that "no specific message is dictated by the State to be displayed on appellants' property. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 9:45 am by Scott Bomboy
Perry, Breyer’s concurring opinion sided with the majority in allowing a Ten Commandments monument to remain in place at the Texas State capitol. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1212, concerns when a takings claim becomes ripe for review. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Peery, 20-6199Issues: (1) Whether a Certificate of Appealability (“COA”) should routinely be granted where the state courts and state judges have divided on the merits of the constitutional question as held by the 5th and 7th Circuits, several District Courts and three justices of this Court, or should courts deny a COA despite the dispute among reasonable state jurists as held by the 9th Circuit and District Court below; (2) whether, as a threshold matter,… [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
California’s CCPA 2.0: Does the US Finally Have a Data Privacy Act? [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:52 pm by Scott Hervey
  The California Court of Appeals decision in No Doubt v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Virginia struck a final blow to Jim Crow by invalidating State laws that prohibited White people from marrying people of color. [read post]