Search for: "Pete v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 9:37 am
The numbers don’t add up, do they Pete? [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:23 pm
” The Ninth Circuit’s December 7 ruling in Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:36 pm
AP writer Pete Yost has this article about the decision.UPDATE: The commenter below says the conviction could still be overturned back in the state courts on state law grounds. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:59 am
The agent lacked that authority, the court ruled.The November 11 decision in Gunn v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:43 am
Good Faith RequirementThe argument by the franchisees that any term violating a state law in any respect comprised a violation of the PMPA’s good faith requirement was rejected. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:27 pm
The plain language of the statute stated that a franchisee or subfranchisor could bring an action against “any person who violates any provision of this chapter,” the court observed.The decision is JMF, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
(R-TX), and Pete Olson (R-TX) issued a statement in response to the ruling saying, "We are pleased with the court's decision to stand up to EPA's overreach. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:44 am
(For example, see Yamagiwa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:19 am
Registration ViolationThe franchisor submitted its franchise registration to the state on April 19, 2007, and the state approved the registration on July 26, 2007, the court noted. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm
Finally, the evidence showed that the premises were controlled by the franchisee and the equipment used at the restaurant belonged to the franchisee.The decision, Conrad v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:40 am
Pete Yost also has this story on today's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
The decision is L&B Truck Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
United States, and, of course, NFIB v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
The decision in Garbinski v. [read post]
