Search for: "Peters v. Department of Revenue" Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that in CIS Services, the court “agreed to review a ruling that critics say would give the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service a sweeping shield from challenges to their regulations. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ed Stein
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals in Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc. employed the Burford abstention doctrine to close the courthouse door to judicial dissolution proceedings even where diversity jurisdiction is present. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser explains why Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
Montana Department of Revenue, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
& Associates, Peter Smith of Law Offices of Peter Smith & Associates, Daniel Nobel, Richard Levit of Levitt & Kaizer(Defendant); Eric Proshansky, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Law Department (the City of New York); David Paldy, Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Tax Enforcement, Special Investigations Unit ( the State of New York); AUSAs James Miskiewicz, John Durham, Diane Leonardo-Beckman.Court Denies Victim’s Request… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Halliburton, Extraterritoriality,Fraud-on-the-Market, Jurisdiction, Omnicare v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's… [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division, First Department Child Support - Award - CSSA - Shared Custody - First Department Rejects Rule Established in Baraby That in an Equally Shared Custody Case the Parent Who Has the Greater Income Should Be Considered the Noncustodial Parent for Purposes of Support In Rubin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Obama Administration orders reconsideration/suspension of new rules (Hal Wegner) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) Manufacturing Alliance on Patent Policy: Apportionment of damages provision will have adverse effects (Patent Docs) (IAM) (Law360) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify for… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
Florida Department of Revenue, a pending cert petition that asks the court to decide whether a state can collect sales tax on online sales of out-of-state products, noting that the “case offers an inverse approach to the vocal criticisms of the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]