Search for: "Pfeiffer v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
The cases included Pfeiffer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Dana Point) and 2) what is the baseline (Pfeiffer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm by Matthias Weller
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]