Search for: "Phillips v. No Defendants Named"
Results 41 - 60
of 539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 8:13 am
The deep south was not ready to accept public defense for indigent, mainly black defendants, not unlike how it refused to accept Brown v School Board. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:39 am
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:02 am
Phillips v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm
Reversed.Case Name: CONNIE MARIE POWELL v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:29 am
Spreeman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am
Reversed and remanded with directions to vacate.Case Name: SHIRLEY WEIDT v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Any belief by the claimants that their injuries were attributable to the actions of the Defendant could only therefore have been unreasonable (or at the very least unreasoned), and the commencement of the proceedings had therefore in effect been ‘speculative’ (per Lord Phillips at para 142). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
The Ministry of Defence sought to defend the claims on the basis that they were time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, s 11(4). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:22 am
In Terry Phillips Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:40 am
The State then told the jury that the number assigned to the cell phone found by Martin `[came] back to the Defendant's name. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:42 am
Affirmed.Case Name: LARRY EDWARD MAGNUS v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:31 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DOUGLAS HOWARD CRAFT v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 5:24 am
Phillip argued that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the named defendant, Franklin, was dead. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
Phillips v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
In that case, the plaintiff, Chris Gordon, head of security with the Irish Horseracing Regulatory Board (IHRB), had been the subject of an orchestrated and severe campaign against his good name by the defendants, the Irish Racehorse Trainers Association (the IRTA). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:31 pm
Affirmed.Case Name: RICHARD DEAN YOUNGBERG v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Phillips v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
Affirmed.Case Name: STEVE EDWARD DOBBINS v. [read post]
