Search for: "Pick v. Pick" Results 41 - 60 of 10,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Each conception of the status quo is defensible, but there is no sound or principled reason to pick one over another as a rule to apply in all cases involving new laws. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am by Dan Farber
  There have been some striking rulings cutting back on agency power, such as West Virginia v. [read post]
Four of Ducey’s picks voted to lift the injunction and revive the moribund law. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 6:04 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 Here is a 1998, Austin Court of Appeals opinion styled, Butler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
[FN2] 2 The district court noted that "[v]enue is not a continental breakfast; you cannot pick and choose on a Plaintiffs' whim where and how a lawsuit is filed. [read post]