Search for: "Plante v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
” A patent applicant is not entitled to a patent when the claimed invention was “in public use… more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:55 am
United States, No. 05-4472 (7th Cir. 11/20/06):In 1986, Kohler decided to build a plant in Mexico that it estimated would cost... [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:54 am
As applied to a major modification made to a cycling or peaking — as opposed to a baseload — power plant, a three-judge panel of the US Court Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:30 am
On Friday, the United States Solicitor General urged the court to refuse to hear Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:56 pm
" United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC (9th Cir.Cal., Nov. 18, 2008, No. 06-56632) U.S.App. 23854, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit examined when the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) may be used to halt construction of a power plant that was granted an integrated permit.The Inland Empire Energy Center (“IEEC”), intended to construct a power plant in Romoland, an unincorporated area of… [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am
Car manufacturer Tesla was ordered to keep its main California plant closed but has opened it anyway. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:27 pm
In response, a number of states rejected the CAMR rule and adopted state programs that established control requirements for every coal plant within their borders. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
McBride (Child Custody) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
See, California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
