Search for: "Polaroid Corporation"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2009, 5:43 am
Not, initially, we may surmise, driven by financial engineering, but certainly driven by stategic corporate decisions. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
They are in turn both owned by News Corporation and Rupert Murdoch (see an interview with Murdoch regarding the iPad). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
And in law, in the January that the AmeriKat was born, Kodak lost a patent infringement case with Polaroid, a loss which signalled Kodak's exit from the instant camera business. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 am
Norquist’s father was a vice-president of Polaroid Corporation. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:13 am
(The Second Circuit's Polaroid case is the other). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 9:21 pm
& not violate stay. t.co/KCl63eO B-NEB: Restrictive covenants requiring ch 11 developer to build certain prefab units in exchange for $1M not executory. t.co/P2hQYbA B-MN: Snapshot in Polaroid preference case (that incl. trustee counterclaim) of constit convolutions caused by Marshall. t.co/BEt2N52 ED-WI reviews law in 7th Circuit on the requirement that a purchaser act in "good faith" in the context of §363 sales. t.co/drmlnyn ED-WI: Issue of good… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
expect that the prior owner is likely to expand into the defendant’s market” under Interpace Corporation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
expect that the prior owner is likely to expand into the defendant’s market” under Interpace Corporation v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
Again: These corporate behemoths are litigating over the use of the words, respectively, “thank you” and “thanks” for — what now? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
Fantasy is that the creators are part of a corporation and so the work began life as work for hire. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
As far as our corporate dynasties go, if history is any sort of guide, they’ve proven to have shorter lifespans that some MLB player careers. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
UCLA School of Law Mark Janis: 1st day of TM: students’ experience of brands as used by owners & 3rd parties is so disconnected from the historical traditions of TM. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:22 am
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) was forced to cover more than $3 billion in losses. [read post]
