Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 1,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm by Florian Mueller
There is nothing an EU regulation could lawfully (and without violating international trade agreements) do to prevent patent holders like 3G Licensing from enforcing their rights in the United States, where damages verdicts can become costly for infringers. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[19] Reasonableness requires prudence but not perfection.[20] Determining Allocability The term “allocate” means “to assign an item of cost, or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives,” and includes “both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share from an indirect cost pool. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Patrick C. Toomey
It has become a domestic surveillance tool, with agents and analysts routinely searching through the enormous pool of collected data for the private communications of Americans. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am by Eric Goldman
In so doing, Davis ignores the fact that every federal judge takes the same solemn oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent [upon] them” under the Constitution and the laws of the United States. [read post]