Search for: "Posner v. Miller"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 6:43 am
See Miller v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:45 am
Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Biomet (ND Ind., Miller, a 14-page opinion, Judge Posner writes:This is an appeal... [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
Miller, 2004 U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
(That teachers' manual also has the added benefit of an analysis I wrote of Richard Posner's opinion on liquidated damages in Lake River v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm
A leading relevant case, Gerber v Keyes, was decided by a Florida appellate court and New York State ruled in a similar fashion in Wegman v Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
“Richard Posner, the Judge,” Harvard Law Review. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Six of which cited the case for its procedural holding.(4) See Barry Miller and Casey Stansbury, Iqbal Energizes Motion to Dismiss Practice (March 10, 2010) (discussing Iqbal’s influence in state court matters).(5) In Siemens Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
Allstate (ND Ind., Miller), a 17-page opinion, Judge Posner writes:This diversity suit for... [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Illinois, and the 1894 decision in Miller v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:20 am
Brewer (CJ Miller), a 6-page opinion, Judge Posner writes: The defendant appeals from his conviction for... [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
In Flying J Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
In US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:06 pm
On the matter of the expressiveness of exotic dance (including the sort that involves nudity), I recommend the (thick) description offered by Judge Richard Posner in his concurrence in Miller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:52 pm
In US V. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
Nelson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
Conley (ND Ind., CJ Miller), a 6-page opinion, Judge Posner writes:The question presented by this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
