Search for: "Post v. Lunney"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
But Oracle v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
Amazon Defeats Publicity Rights Lawsuit Over ‘A Gronking To Remember’ Book Cover (Forbes Cross-Post)
28 Mar 2016, 8:54 am
Armslist and the old Lunney v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Lunney: You show larger revenues for big content industries in nations with fair use v. those without, but you aren’t making causal claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Lunney: Why do TM owners sue over tarnishment then? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Glynn Lunney: Book talks about equality of speakers. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Lunney: Preserving incentives or preserving creation? [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 2:36 pm
Case Citation: Weigand v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Monge v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm
They went on to distinguish expected/accepted copying v. offensive copying. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Findings: Nearly 70% are post-Campbell. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Case by case v. systematic: the cost of false positives and false negatives; court doesn’t consider the long-run consequences, like Boston Hockey or post-sale confusion. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
Lunney: Are these leftover Dastar TM claims? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
Still might be a case for enforcement—the legitimate seller still needs some way of recovering; illegality can be a form of price discrimination by segmenting the market.Sprigman: law on books v. law on streets. [read post]
