Search for: "Potter v. Potter"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm
"Harry Potter and the Healthcare Statute of Doom: In King v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
" Indeed, I'd go further: fans are much less likely to assert claims, because (1) by definition, they like the underlying work, and (2) they have much more reason to fear losing their own authorship status, see, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
Additional Resources: Montgomery v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am
The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada and in Potter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 7:05 pm
In Potter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Warner Bros., which owns the film rights to the Harry Potter books, and Harry Potter author J.K. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 8:13 am
In Potter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:36 am
Oral Argument in case: 07-1530; Smith, Regina v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:51 pm
Potter, John (civil case) [uploaded: 02/27/2007] [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:10 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-2987; Flora Kimble v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:27 pm
Oral Argument in case: 06-4018; Huppert, Joshua v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
Oral Argument in case: 07-1589; Hancock, Teresa v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:41 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-2815; Carla Hill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
It was Potter v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:49 am
Potter, 282 F.3d 542, 547 (8th Cir.2002) (same); Walton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
In Potter v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:57 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
