Search for: "Potts v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
No benefit the state may assert can outweigh the countervailing public interest in protecting consumers. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Brian Potts at The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Rebecca Leber in the New Republic, and Tom Donnelly at Grist. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
Counsel states that because of the beneficiary's behavior, her firm performed services that far exceeded those typically required in estate administration. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:58 am by Brian A. Hall
” The Board followed the landmark decision in Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
" In January the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a previous Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that the Clean Water Act did not regulate pesticide application "into, over, or near ‘waters of the United States'" as long as EPA labeling requirements were followed.The Sixth Circuit ruled in "National Cotton Council v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Potts(1982), 1982 CanLII 1751 (ON CA), 66 C.C.C. (2d) 219 (Ont. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:40 pm by Eric Goldman
Amicus briefs in support of the preliminary injunction Internet Association RCFP et al EFF et al Chamber of Progress et al TechFreedom Blog post on the amicus briefs Preliminary injunction brief (if you get an error message downloading one of the files below, hit refresh) Schruers declaration Szabo declaration Veitch declaration Potts declaration Rumenap declaration Esparza declaration Pavlovic declaration Blog post on preliminary injunction brief Netchoice v. [read post]