Search for: "Powell v. Howes" Results 41 - 60 of 934
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
But a lot depends on how one interprets the statute—and how the tax is applied in practice. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:10 am by Tess Bridgeman
Just Security is delighted to announce the release of the first book in our partnership with Oxford University Press (OUP), Race and National Security, edited by Matiangai V. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court as a whole adopted Justice Powell’s view twenty-five years later in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
But what Pritchard and Thompson show is how remarkably successful Powell was at turning the tide of the court’s approach to securities law. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
Grutter also reaffirmed Justice Powell’s opinion announcing the judgment of a splintered Court in Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Robyn Powell
Supreme Court addressed the exhaustion issue in Fry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]