Search for: "Powers v. Arizona Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
How the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation acquired the drug is both a mystery and an apparent impediment to its use. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
I am not trying to be “politically correct” but this Blog is read throughout the world, and I seek to avoid misunderstanding at the risk and cost of repetition and being non politically correct. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
Even if a particular Justice concludes that most of Trump’s (and the Colorado Republican Party’s) many arguments are unavailing, Trump only needs to convince that Justice that one of those arguments is correct in order to preclude that Justice from voting to affirm. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
States have also tried to go to court to enforce these laws in cases like Arizona v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
Arizona In Khorrami v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
I would greatly welcome any corrections or other substantive reactions, especially since I am teaching these questions to my students this semester! [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Department of Treasury, 11-45, which was relisted after the October 7 Conference. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Moreover, Arizona can, and says it will, appeal her decision. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) and Rucho v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
Justice Platkin began his legal analysis with a quote from the First Department’s 2012 ruling in the AriZona Iced Tea dissolution case, where that court wrote, The buyout election accommodates the interests of the respective parties in ensuring the continued functioning of the business, while also protecting the financial interest of the shareholders and creditors. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
On remand, my friend Ilan Wurman, law professor at Arizona State, pushed the Appointments Clause argument (among others), but his arguments were rejected by District Judge James Wesley Hendrix; this appeal follows. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus, Justice Kagan’s dissent for herself and three others, quoting from the 1984 Arizona v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
” However, because Standlee v. [read post]
