Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 41 - 60
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 9:13 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the justices will weigh in on whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice from the IRS is a jurisdictional requirement – so that the Tax Court lacks the power to review the petition when it is filed late – or instead can be extended when circumstances warrant. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:59 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 21-379Issues: (1) Whether an agency rule delegating rulemaking authority to a private entity violates the nondelegation doctrine; and (2) whether the statute of limitations applicable to a challenge to an agency rule that delegates rulemaking authority to a private entity starts to run when the agency delegates the authority or when the private entity exercises the delegated authority. [read post]
Cortec v Republic of Kenya: Cautionary tale on local due diligence for international mining projects
12 Aug 2021, 8:38 am
Prospecting, as such, involves cost not revenue. [read post]
Cortec v Republic of Kenya: Cautionary tale on local due diligence for international mining projects
12 Aug 2021, 8:38 am
Prospecting, as such, involves cost not revenue. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
The statute was and remains Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
The statute was and remains Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
14 May 2021, 10:30 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 20-1472Issue: Whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice of determination from the commissioner of internal revenue in 26 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
(3) If the Court of Session and/or the Sheriff Court do not have this power, does this constitute a breach of EU law? [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
” The news received wide international coverage. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:51 am
The ICO has the power to take action to change the behavior of organizations and individuals that collect, use and keep personal information. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am
This appeal considers whether the court has jurisdiction to direct members of a charitable company on how to exercise their powers absent breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:42 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, that the case presents “an opportunity to place limits on an inappropriate exercise of administrative agency power. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
” This incentive structure works quite well for the majority of cases.However, the same cannot be said of misconduct committed by “superstar” or “rainmaker” employees and others who generate significant revenue flows or hold high executive positions in the companies they dominate. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:37 pm
EmeraChem Power, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
This appeal will consider whether CITCO BVI and TCCL breached any duties owed to Cibin in issuing a power of attorney for the sale of property. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
In Steward, an Alabama corporation paid the tax required under the statute before filing a claim for refund with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, claiming it could recover the payment because the statute was unconstitutional. [read post]
