Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth" Results 41 - 60 of 929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Shari Shapiro
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Justice Mason in the Australian Assistance Plan case (1975): nationhood, Federalism and Commonwealth executive power Peta Stephenson11. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
The commonwealth government of Puerto Rico gained Court review Thursday of its claim that, since Congress gave it self-governing powers in 1950, it has the power to pass its own laws as a sovereign government, like any state in the Union. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am by ernst
Peter Gerangelos, University of Sydney Law School, has posted Sir Owen Dixon and the Concept of 'Nationhood' as a Source of Commonwealth Power, which appears in Sir Owen Dixon's Legacy (Federation Press, 2019): 56-79:Owen Dixon (wiki)The principal focus of this chapter is to trace from the reasoning of Dixon J, and those whom he influenced, the High Court’s evolving jurisprudence with respect to the concept of “nationhood” as a source of… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by Steven M. Regan
On July 26, 2012, in a decision of major significance to the Marcellus Shale industry, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in the case of Robinson Township et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Lammers
However, while I was reading a recent decision by the Virginia Supreme Court - Kozmina v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 12:16 pm by Westendorf & Khalaf, PLLC
W&K has obtained the full trial transcripts for your enjoyment and education:  Judge Plowman: This is the matter of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]