Search for: "Price v. Age, Ltd."
Results 41 - 60
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm
" Fitness Entm't Ltd v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
In LG Display Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:37 pm
See LG Display Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The Sun has settled a defamation claim brought by an immigration solicitor it accused of “shamelessly touting” a price list of legal aid fees for migrants arriving in small boats. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C… [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Infineon Technologies AG et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
e-Alert http://t.co/Z14rKpVwPG -> Eng.CA sends case back to CJEU ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TVCatchup Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 204 http://t.co/frClUO3ttD -> Facebook, New York Times deal could change the news biz http://t.co/1Drjkrl2pF -> The B.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:04 am
Mendoza, 1994 CanLII 419 (B.C.S.C.), and Burrard Import Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:24 am
One such notion -- that of a design's "individual character" -- is edging a little closer to clarification now that Advocate General Melchior Wathelet has the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) his Opinion this morning in Case C‑345/13 Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd, a reference for a preliminary ruling all the way from the Supreme Court, Ireland. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:20 pm
Shortly thereafter, in November 2009, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (“BCCA”) – in Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
The previous week's Katposts lined up like this:* It's not over till the Pink Lady sues: crunch time for apple appeal and applicationJeremy reports on Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
Referring to Arnold J (as he then was) in Sky Plc v Skykick UK Ltd in the High Court (the available relevant law at the time of application), even though there was no express requirement for intention to use a trade mark when registering it, such an application could constitute bad faith. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
The Supreme Court put an end to this strategy when it decided the international price-fixing case, Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
According to the referring court, Ferrari had used those trade marks to identify replacement and accessory parts of high-priced luxury sports cars previously sold under those trade marks. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Fisher-Price Inc. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Are competition authorities ready to deal with a new age of ‘robot-enhanced’ price setting? [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm
HOJ Industried Ltd., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986 at 998-999, the Supreme Court of Canada adopted these factors; in Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
