Search for: "Price v. Jackson et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
At 10 a.m. on Monday, the Supreme Court opens its first sitting of the new year with oral argument in an important environmental law case, Sackett, et al., v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
§ 1011 et seq., with regard to plaintiffs bringing tort claims for exposure to radioactivity. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
New York, et al. (10-1404) and Oneida Indian Nation, et al., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
Jackson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am
Registrar of Genetic Resources et al, Monsanto intervening) perhaps tells the whole story. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Price Foundation (WAPF). [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
Jackson v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
Price Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0264n.06 Sanchez v. [read post]
