Search for: "Price v. Phillips"
Results 41 - 60
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2021, 1:23 pm
Price Waterhouse. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
The consultation requirement applies to a “set of works” (Phillips v Francis (2014) EWCA Civ 1395), and if a contractor engaged to carry out a set of works is unable to complete it there is no requirement for a fresh consultation about the same set of works, even if the price is going to go up (as it normally will if the original contractor gave the cheapest quote), and even if the tenant’s contribution i [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:05 am
Phillips Petroleum). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Ford Presidential LibraryKristin Phillips, Public Affairs Specialist, the Gerald R. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Commissioners Wilson and Phillips disagreed with the majority’s position. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
Indeed, the classic case of alleged predatory pricing, Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am
Lewis v Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price Hecht LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 03911 Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department shows the high bar for a Judiciary Law § 487 claim. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
But why not include Chisholm v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
Phillips Petroleum Company v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:18 am
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:07 pm
” 1 PHILLIP E. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm
California Courts have taken this lenient approach because ‘the law and facts to promote the beneficial purposes of the homestead legislation to benefit the debtor’” [Phillips v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
In the Courts Australia Aaren Pty Ltd trading as Price Beat Travel v Arya [2020] NSWDC 657 – the defendant was dissatisfied with the services she received from the plaintiff’s travel agency when flying to India. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
This proposition is - again - uncontroversial in light of Douglas v Hello!. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
Its 1989 ruling in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The Court overturned the convictions in the Moore et al. v. [read post]
