Search for: "Price v. Price et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
Short Reports Have a substantial immediate impact on stock price. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Facts: This case (Jones et al v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Goldsmith et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Because the presumption in Baxter has not been rebutted, the damages owed to the respondents are equivalent to the difference between the sale price received by the appellants on the resale and the price received by the respondents on the initial sale to the appellants. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
NAR, et al. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Corwin, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm
(Hannah Lang, et al., Reuters). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 7:21 am
The lawsuit is captioned, Burnett et al v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
[iv] Flawed Best Value Analyses In addition to overturning best value decisions based on flawed technical evaluations[v], GAO also reaffirmed its view that a Source Selection Authority’s (“SSA’s”) reliance solely on adjectival ratings without consideration of lower rated but acceptable proposals, with lower relative prices, was improper. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 3:47 pm
The matter is entitled Benoit Ford LLC et al v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Our model advances the measurement of expected profitability by leveraging a deep-learning approach developed by Farrell et al. (2022). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
In a shifting climate—literally and metaphorically—insurers may see an opportunity—or a necessity—to adjust their pricing models. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:37 am
The 2016 Hoffman v L&M Arts case is a notable example of the delicate balance between personal privacy and the required transparency in the art market. [7] The main focal point of the case is the well-known Mark Rothko painting, called “Red Rothko” formerly owned by Marguerite Hoffman, the plaintiff. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Ulrich Kranz et al. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
Avanci et al., 5th Cir., 2022) to the East Coast (FTC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Levin, et al., Recent Developments in Property Insurance Coverage Litigation, 44 Tort Trial & Ins. [read post]
