Search for: "Price v. Sheppard"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 9:26 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:29 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
Sandager v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
In June 2024, after an oral hearing in Bulone v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
Sheppard Mullin attorneys have deep and broad experience in redevelopment, and we stand ready to assist you. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm
EO N-4-25 will likely be at odds with recent case law that sets the requirements for analyzing a project’s impacts on evacuation routes and wildfire risk, including People of the State of California ex rel Rob Bonta Attorney General v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm
The Final Rules add a new section (v) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K that require certain public reporting companies to describe the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid by the company to its NEOs and the financial performance of the company over a specified time horizon and to disclose each of the following in a prescribed tabular format. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
It noted, quoting the United States Supreme Court in Bell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
The Balancing Act – Avoiding Attorney General Oversight and Approval v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
The Balancing Act – Avoiding Attorney General Oversight and Approval v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 8:34 am
Then again, there’s the spin on what was accomplished, the spin inherent in ignoring the conspicuous agency setbacks, and the question of whether a mixed record and no real acceleration of enforcement output—compare, for example, the assessments offered by the Sheppard Mullin’s Antitrust Law Blog and the Progressive Policy Institute—indicates that anything was “reinvigorated” relative to the antitrust-enforcement record of prior administrations, whether… [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm
The Regulatory Review would like to thank the members of the 2021-2022 editorial board for their passion and hard work in producing this publication. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:31 am
His focus: the bottom of the pyramid—software, self-help dramatically changing the environment. 2/3 of legal services have moved to corporate clients, who are more price sensitive. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm
[v] As a result, an existing portfolio company (regardless of size) of a private equity fund may be ineligible to receive a Main Street Loan. [read post]
