Search for: "Price v. State Of Texas" Results 41 - 60 of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Aimee Hess
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion last year in Waggoner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
On June 20, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ritchie v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:46 am by SHG
Texas cites two cases in support of this proposition, Dun & Bradstreet v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The term of the consent decree is seven years.The case is U.S. and State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
Now Texas and those six other states must hire attorneys for indigent clients earlier in the process. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:35 am by John McFarland
Another provision in the Hyders’ lease disclaimed the holding in Heritage v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]