Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
These companion decisions by the British Columbia Court of Appeal were in contrast and conflict to a third Quebec Court of Appeal decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm
Superior Court, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2010). [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Selling goods or services below cost with the intent to, and the tendency to, injure competitors violates Business and Professions Code §17043 and therefore gives rise to an action under Business and Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition law).Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v Superior Court (2003) 114 CA4th 309, 327, 7 CR3d 628. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:11 am
In its recent opinion in the case of Price v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
Because the Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
Superior Court, 2015 WL 182297 (Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:21 pm
Superior Court of San Francisco 159 Cal.App.4th 911 (2008) . [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:55 am
In The Provident Bank v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
In The Provident Bank v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
Amazon charges about 70% of what FEDEX or UPS charge but charging a lower price for a superior service benefits consumers. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
On July 12, 2010, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Clayworth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:31 pm
Rodriguez, et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiff contractor’s $4.1 million claim for additional compensation on the basis that the contractor had failed to abide by the contractual notice provision for making claims for additional compensation. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 11:26 am
This case was an appeal from a decision of the Quebec Superior Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 5:26 pm
When I first read the precedential ruling of the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Shell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
The judge of the Superior Court wrote that such exclusions apply only when inadequate price is the sole allegation in the underlying complaint. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:00 am
Fenwick, 2011 ONSC 2068, an Ontario case on a letter rogatory from the New Jersey Superior Court seeking a summons for a deposition in Ontario. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
The Court noted that, "Because of the rapid price fluctuations in the grain market, oral contracts are the norm. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
In the case of Armstrong v Lendon, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that the employer had to pay 21 months of reasonable notice plus aggravated damages for the manner of termination which caused humiliation, embarrassment and the loss of self-esteem. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:47 am
McLean and Pratt, Superior Court of Maine, Cumberland County, No. [read post]
