Search for: "Price v. United States Government et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm
The court’s full ruling in State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
Et. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
DiMattia et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:50 am
Mylan, et al. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:57 am
Navistar Defense, LLC, et al., No. 13-cv-1463 (D.D.C). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
At about 11 a.m. on Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has just released the much anticipated decision in Information and Privacy Commissioner, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
BP PLC, et al.). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
Battle, et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Then the post discusses the regulation of Apple’s App Store in the United States and China. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
United States, the Court of Claims expressed doubt that lost profits could ever be awarded except “after the strictest proof that the patentee would actually have earned and retained those sums in its sales to the Government. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]