Search for: "Primus v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She also suggested I add Eve Primus' article, "Culture as a Structural Problem in Indigent Defense" to the list. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:13 pm by James Fox
  Although it was supplemental to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, northern states had passed personal liberty laws that had generally weakened enforcement of the 1793 Act and caused southern slaveowners to press for stronger federal protection of slavery (Justice Story’s opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
DeStefano (and before that, prefigured perfectly by Richard Primus in this article). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
” The Litigation There are a total of 66 victim claims in litigation in more than a dozen states. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 Whatever you call it, I want to argue that both Greene and Primus are unduly pessimistic about the capacity of lawyers of all political persuasions to find practical uses for the constitutional legacy they have inherited from the New Deal and Civil rights eras.Consider, first, that my approach to the twentieth century canon adopts the very  same framework that is dominant amongst politically conservative lawyers. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm by Guest Blogger
This issue could have been solved by viewing Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eve Brensike Primus (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Effective Trial Counsel after Martinez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Just after Primus/Roche (in which I acted for Primus) I wrote that a case such as this is different from Primus-Roche, in which each of the Roche entities only infringed in their own country. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Howard Knopf
Glover, they do not correctly state “the law as it stands in the United States”. [read post]