Search for: "Pringle v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
State of Maryland, Court of Appeals 2006 Term, No. 59. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Christina Sonsire
  In August, Pennsylvania’s Superior Court handed down a ruling in Pringle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:17 am
" Maryland v Pringle, 540 US 366, 370-371 (2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
" The prior Superior Court decision in which this defense was first found to be invalid was the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Of particular note, he stated Torrential Downpour's direct connection capabilities were no different from other commercially available versions of BitTorrent and it (Torrential Downpour) had no rate of error.U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Pringle (probable cause to arrest), as they are in the current casebook. [read post]