Search for: "Pro-Sweep LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Wyeth, LLC, 2012 WL 3575293, at *9 (E.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
People equally lack a First Amendment right, for instance, to illegally refuse to hire lawful permanent residents, even if such a refusal is aimed at sending an anti-immigrant message; to illegally hire aliens who lack work authorization, even if such hiring is aimed at sending a pro-open-borders message; to do business with North Korean entities (if a law forbids that), even if such dealing is aimed at sending what they see as a pro-peace message; to refuse to do business with… [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court cases could give Republican legislators in battleground states sweeping control over election procedures, with ramifications that could include power over how states select presidential electors. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
People equally lack a First Amendment right, for instance, to illegally refuse to hire lawful permanent residents,[2] even if such a refusal is aimed at sending an anti-immigrant message; to illegally hire aliens who lack work authorization, even if such a refusal is aimed at sending a pro-open-borders message; to do business with North Korean entities (if a law forbids that), even if such dealing is aimed at sending what they see as a pro-peace message; to refuse to do business… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Patent Office, sustained an injunction against portions of the sweeping patent reform rules proposed for implementation by the PTO, Federal Circuit, Spring 2009 Cordis Corporation v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014)—in which the court held that prosecutors in tipper/tippee insider trading cases must show that the tipper received a “personal benefit” of a pecuniary or quid pro quo nature in exchange for the tip—and the circuit split that was recently created by the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
No. 16-0107 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ---------------------------------------------------------Albert G. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
In a historic vote in August, the Utah Supreme Court approved sweeping changes in legal services regulation in that state. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Simmering Threat of Violence Comes to Fore with Search of Trump Property MSN – Hannah Allam (Washington Post) | Published: 8/9/2022 Within hours of the FBI search at Donald Trump’s Florida compound, Republican lawmakers, conservative talk-show hosts, anti-government provocateurs, and pro-Trump conspiracy theorists began issuing explicit or thinly veiled calls for violence. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:04 am
The effort was undertaken by two newly created groups: Pro-Democracy Center and Pro-Democracy Campaign. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
Pro. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Put Arizona First said it was funded entirely by an entity called SPH Medical LLC, whose address, according to the form, was a UPS store in Phoenix. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The number of plaintiffs filing TCPA claims ballooned from 14 in 2008 to 827 in 2011, rocketed to 3,015 in 2014, and peaked at 4,638 in 2016 according to WebRecon LLC. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
. * * * Arkansas Act 689 of 2023 NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See, ICM Registry, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
This targeted sweep is the first of its kind following the New Marketing Rules’ compliance deadline in November 2022. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
That was a year marked by two historic advances – the August vote by the Utah Supreme Court approving sweeping changes in legal services regulation in that state, followed two weeks later by the Arizona Supreme Court going even farther, becoming the first state in the nation to completely eliminate the ban on nonlawyers having economic interests in law firms and the prohibition on lawyers sharing legal fees with nonlawyers. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
That was a year marked by two historic advances – the August vote by the Utah Supreme Court approving sweeping changes in legal services regulation in that state, followed two weeks later by the Arizona Supreme Court going even farther, becoming the first state in the nation to completely eliminate the ban on nonlawyers having economic interests in law firms and the prohibition on lawyers sharing legal fees with nonlawyers. [read post]
