Search for: "Property Owners v. Mayor"
Results 41 - 60
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:07 am
In this case, due to the Unitarian Church’s status as the owner of property adjacent to the Church Street Lot, it clearly held an interest in the Fountain Square application to amend the Ordinance. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:13 pm
The property owners' merits brief is available here. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:25 pm
Mayor and Council of Rockville v Pumphrey, 2014 WL 3752100 (MD 7/31/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Zoning-Adopting/Amending [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:00 pm
Garner v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Nakazawa v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:03 pm
OFDI also failed to prove that the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens and property owners of the municipality and territory would not be materially retarded in the absence of this annexation. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 12:01 am
California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987):We have repeatedly held that, as to property reserved by its owner for private use, "the right to exclude [others is] `one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property.'" Loretto v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
Last year Moreno wielded that weapon to block plans for a Wal-Mart in his ward, saying he had issues with the property owner and that Wal-Mart was not “a perfect fit for the area. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 8:32 pm
City of Bethel Heights v City of Springdale, 2017 Ark. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 5:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
But when the property involved is private property, you usually hear very little about the burdens placed on the owner, or the cost to the public of preservation. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm
At trial the Ocean County Superior Court Judge David Millard ruled in Karans’ favor that the dune offered no special benefit to the property but rather a general benefit that inured to the entire group of property owners on the island. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:21 am
And who does the mayor blame when the residents mob returns demanding a reduction in the bear tax? [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:53 pm
Blackford County Area Board of Zoning Appeals, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a trial court’s decision that a property owner lacked standing to challenge a BZA decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:12 am
In McIntyre v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:09 am
Mayor Has Apologized for Kelo Property Seizures, the newly elected Mayor of New London, Connecticut, has apologized to the property owners impacted by the condemnation involved in the infamous Kelo v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:09 am
Mayor Has Apologized for Kelo Property Seizures, the newly elected Mayor of New London, Connecticut, has apologized to the property owners impacted by the condemnation involved in the infamous Kelo v. [read post]
