Search for: "Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. EPA"
Results 41 - 60
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2012, 4:57 am
Again, one must ask: to what public purpose? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
On environmental issues, Srinivasan has written opinions both for and against regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a ban on most asbestos products, based on a 10-year study that found the material was dangerous to human health. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:53 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a final ruling to ban most asbestos-containing products. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm
The controversy began shortly after the Court’s April 29 announcement of its decision in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
” Environmental Working Group also drew public attention to a second EPA proposal, published one day later, that would opt not to hold chemical manufacturers financially accountable for chemical contamination at Superfund sites. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that lead emissions from certain aircraft engines could endanger public health, qualifying those aircraft for emissions regulation under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Can provincial environmental ministries use their regulatory powers to force the funds of insolvent organizations to be spent on environmental cleanups, in priority to the claims of creditors, pensioners, employees, and others? [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:06 pm
Last year’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:09 am
Environmental Protection Agency, reacting to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling finding that EPA did have authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, has begun a series of actions under the Act to start regulating such pollution. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Inslee, 20-1334Issue: Whether a law that skews the debate over the value of public-sector unions and undermines public-sector employees’ opt-out rights by giving incumbent unions exclusive access to information necessary to communicate with public-sector employees is consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
" (IFC, Environmental, Social, and Governance).The goal oriented policy objectives of ESG have also been underscored by the OECD, one that seeks to recionceive the traditional focus on value maximization grounded in traditional financial analysis to a more generalized set of public objectives toward which economic actoivity can contribute, on e in which the markers of financial value are made more a function of public good objectives. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1484Issue: (1) Whether, contrary to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Similarly, in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
EPA, holding that the Clean Air Act covered carbon dioxide emissions and that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could therefore decide whether or not to regulate them. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested public input on a draft study exploring the regulation and reuse of wastewater from the oil and gas industry. [read post]
