Search for: "Public Service Co. v. United Cable" Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
Ms Kelly-Brown argued that the defendants’ repeated use of the phrase “Own Your Power” had caused reverse confusion within the market for motivational services and publications, and therefore infringed her service mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Ten years after the publication of an article about Naomi Campbell, the European Court of Human Rights decided that the recovery of success fees from the Mirror would be “disproportionate“, in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-402, which called for the overruling of National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am by Ray Dowd
Copyright Office attesting to the authenticity of a record or report based on a search of the Office’s records; a type of copyright service available for a fee. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Judge Kimball ruled that Aereo's retransmission of video signals was "indistinguishable from a cable company. [read post]