Search for: "Publishers Press, Inc. v. Technology Funding, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The second case, SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm by INFORRM
The Court then concluded that this provision of the Press Act violated the right to freedom of expression and press of individuals, journalists, and mass media.ArgentinaGoogle Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 1 February 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgment in the case of The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
Soda Pop (Public Knowledge) Copyright Tribunal: new regime gets first outing: Archive Media Publishing Ltd v MCPS (The 1709 Blog) Media content: Senior citizens front and centre? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" This question is particularly pressing for the Antitrust Division, which in the past has come forward to play a significant role in response to economic crises. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources MsLods’ Law+Technology Round up, 28 January 2016 ‘Privacy and Freedom of the Press from 2004-2015: From Campbell to Leveson’ , in L Edwards Law, Policy and the Internet (Hart Publishing: Forthcoming), Lachlan Urquhart, University of Nottingham, School of Computer Science First Amendment Speculation and Conjecture, Tyler Broker, University of Arizona – James E. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Technology, like any tool, must be used with skill and purpose. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO published one decision of the Complaints Committee: 19858-17 Walker v mirror.co.uk. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
IPSO had a press release “Press regulator publishes guidance on reporting of Muslims and Islam”. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Doughty Street Chambers published this press release on the ruling in relation to the sedition charge and another press release on the urgent appeal filed with the UN, which is available to read here. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]