Search for: "QUICKEN LOANS INC"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 4:57 am
Schulte, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:19 pm
Quicken Loans, the Supreme Court also rejected the CFPB’s position. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:11 am
In Quicken Loans, Inc., the employee worked from 2006 until her resignation in late 2011. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:41 am
Last week, in Quicken Loans, Inc., No. 28-CA-75857 (N.L.R.B. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
Last week—in Quicken Loans,Inc. (1/8/13) [pdf]—an NLRB administrative law judge invalidated the confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in an employment agreement between Quicken Loans an an ex-mortgage banker, Lydia Garza. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit examined an appeal by the plaintiffs of a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Quicken Loans, Inc. on the plaintiffs' claim that they were entitled to overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of 40 during a given workweek. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm
Quicken Loans Inc.pdf, Case No. 11-2125 (6th Cir. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:11 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:11 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:11 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:11 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:09 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
Quicken Loans, centered on a provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., including the prospect that the decision “could encourage the practice of ‘marking up’ fees by mortgage lenders, escrow officers and others that had been banned by federal regulators for the last decade.” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represented the petitioners in Freeman, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., No. 10-1042, and HUD’s interpretation lost. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:46 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., in which the Court held that unearned fees – fees for which lenders do not provide any services – violate federal law only if the fees are split between two companies. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., and rejected pleas to legislative interpretation, enforcement discretion, and an old policy by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Mortgage discount fees No RESPA violation Not split with others Opinion: pdf html [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:24 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., No. 10-1042, 2012 WL 1868063 (U.S. [read post]