Search for: "Qualcomm" Results 41 - 60 of 2,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2018, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Four months back, Qualcomm's lead counsel in the German Qualcomm v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:59 pm
A key issue is  Qualcomm's assertion of the privilege. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 1:46 pm
  (Though that opinion might change either way if Qualcomm waived the privilege and we had more facts.) [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
So Qualcomm collects royalties--as Qualcomm told the IRS--on the whole enchilada because it's "humongously more lucrative. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:17 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's order unsurprisingly denying Qualcomm's motion for a stay of the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust remedies, Qualcomm has taken this matter to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit (this post continues below the document):19-07-08 Qualcomm Motion to... by on ScribdI just wanted to be of service and share the document with you, though I lack the time right now to go into detail (I may do so later, most likely after… [read post]
In its largest acquisition ever, Qualcomm is buying the semiconductor manufacturer Atheros Communications in a deal that values the company at $3.1 billion. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Florian Mueller
In a Wall Street Journal interview, Qualcomm's top lawyer explained that the request for an import ban relates only to iPhones with non-Qualcomm (practically, that would simply mean Intel) baseband processors because of the public interest factor: Qualcomm argues that it would be OK to block some iPhones from importation into the U.S. while others (those using Qualcomm chips) would remain available. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
The following month, the FTC and Apple sued Qualcomm on antitrust grounds in California. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
Yes, she did, as Qualcomm accurately notes, and unlike Qualcomm I think she was right to do so, though some people's mileage may vary. [read post]
22 May 2019, 10:32 am by Gene Quinn
So why would the FTC continue to persecute Qualcomm given the revelations in the Apple/Qualcomm litigation that demonstrate that Qualcomm did not seek an unreasonably high licensing rate? [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:10 am by Damien Geradin
” Nokia withdrew its complaint in July 2008 after reaching a global settlement of its licensing disputes with Qualcomm. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm, where Qualcomm brought counterclaims including one related to tortious interference. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Steve Brachmann
If Qualcomm's allegations are true, Apple will apparently stop at nothing to avoid paying licensing fees for Qualcomm’s patented technologies. [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:07 pm by Gene Quinn
Meanwhile, fabricated licensing rates wholly unrelated to the Qualcomm portfolio were used by Apple to dupe regulators into chasing Qualcomm across the world for committing phantom antitrust violations. [read post]