Search for: "Quinn v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 pm
Waxman Chief Defense Lawyer Quinn Jones... [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:32 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
The  judgment of Justice Quinn in Bruni v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:29 am
Quinn is firmly convinced that “the new patent rules will substantially change patent law and practice and negatively affect all companies and individuals who use the U.S. patent system. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm by Walter Olson
Quinn, the Supreme Court case over whether states may properly herd home caregivers reimbursed by government checks into collective representation [syndicated]. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 9:20 am by Paul Caron
More states now follow a federal reliability standard, following Daubert v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by admin
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment  […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses Unconstitutional… [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Rita (Threlkel) Quinn v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:34 am by Lawrence Solum
This article begins with the intellectual primogenitor of this approach: Barron v. [read post]