Search for: "R C SMITH"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 3:31 pm
(R) 14th District: Linda Greenstein (D) 15th District: Shirley Turner (D) 16th District: Andrew Zwicker (D) 17th District: Bob Smith (D) 18th District: Patrick Diegnan Jr. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 8:03 am
Sources Towhey, Jessica R. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 am
José de Córdoba reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:19 am
See Wayne R. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:31 am
Northern District of Georgia Judge Steve C. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:23 am
Jane C. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:02 am
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith (R-MO) subpoenaed IRS and [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
Cohen with the Mary C. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
Cohen with the Mary C. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:11 am
José de Córdoba reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
But none reached the market despite millions in R&D from National Institute of Justice. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:01 am
CMS’ Consideration CMS to offer an initial meeting with the manufacturer CMS to meet with FDA counterparts to review the technology [Optional] CMS may initiate a benefit category review to determine whether the device—if approved—would likely be coverable through one or more benefit categories C. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Charles R. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:17 am
Mark C. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
