Search for: "R V"
Results 41 - 60
of 145,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2008, 11:20 am
R v Winters:[2008] EWCA Crim 2953; [2008] WLR (D) 387 “For the purpose of making the required assumptions in relation to determining whether the defendant had benefited from drug trafficking, the Crown was required to prove on the balance of probabilities that expenditure on mortgage payments was incurred by the defendant out of payments received by [...] [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:59 am
R v Greene “Where a judge ruled that a witness could be treated as a hostile in examination at trial within the meaning of s 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 by the party calling him, but that witness did not in the event prove to be hostile, the judge was still obliged to warn [...] [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:24 am
R v Downer [2009] EWCA Crim 1361; [2009] WLR (D) 233 “The offence of aggravated burglary under s 10 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 was not to be regarded as an indivisible offence and, in order to find out what constituted a burglary, it was essential to have regard to the two types of burglary [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
R v Kousar [2008]; [2009] WLR (D) 16 “A wife who shared the matrimonial home with her husband, whom she knew was storing merchandise from his business at home, but acquiesced in it being there and did not demand he remove it, was not in control or possession of the goods within the meaning of s [...] [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:06 am
: The SCC's decision in R v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:28 am
R v Rochford; [2010] WLR (D) 220 “A failure by a defendant to comply with the requirements of ss 5(5) and 6A of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 to provide a defence statement containing the general nature of his defence, did not constitute a contempt of court and was only punishable with sanctions specified in s 11 of the 1996 Act, of a court or other party being permitted to make comment on that failure, or the court or jury being permitted to drawing… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:23 am
R v Ahmed; [2010] WLR (D) 219 “The act of procuring the miscarriage of a woman’s child did not, by itself, amount to an offence known to English law. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:27 am
Assistant Professor Shaun Fluker of the University of Calgary has posted a comment on the recent decision in R. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:13 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 38 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v DPP [2014] UKSC 38 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:20 pm
This decision involved analysis of the principles articulated in R. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:25 am
R (BA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (PE (Cameroon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 119; [2009] WLR (D) 77 “A right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order was exercisable from within the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
R v R (Video Recording: Admissibility) [2008] EWCA Crim 678; [2008] WLR (D) 95 “A video recording of an interview given had been was properly admitted as evidence in chief at a criminal trial pursuant to a special measures direction made under s27 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, notwithstanding that no notification had been given by the Secretary of State under s18(2) of the Act that such measures were available. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829; [2010] WLR (D) 99 “The concern of s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is limited to the valuation of property and does not extend to the realisation of property, so that it does not have to be assumed that a beneficial interest in property has to be sold separately from the property and, for the purposes of making a confiscation order, the correct basis on which to proceed is to take into account the due proportion of the proceeds… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:38 am
R (Saunders) v Independent Police Complaints Commission and another; R (Tucker) v Independent Police Complaints Commission and another; [2008] WLR (D) 315 “The Independent Police Complaints Commission did not act incompatibly with Convention rights in not giving a direction to chief officers to prohibit conferring between officers following a fatal shooting by police officers. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:35 am
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in R v Golds on 14 June 2016, concerning the defence of diminished responsibility where a murder charge was at issue. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:37 am
R (King) v Secretary of State for Justice: (Bourgass and another) v Same: CA Civ 376; [2012] WLR (D) 102 “For the purposes of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights there was no civil right derived from domestic and common law to associate with fellow prisoners, so that an administrative decision to segregate or continue segregation of a prisoner was not a determination of such a right.” WLR Daily, 27th Mach 2012 Source:… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:27 am
R v A [2008] EWCA Crim 2908; [2008] WLR (D) 374 “The expression ‘new and compelling evidence … in relation to the qualifying offence’ in s 78(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was not restricted to further evidence either from an individual who suggested that the defendant had admitted after the trial that he was [...] [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:41 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 1900; [2008] WLR (D) 294 “A person called to the Bar who had not found a place in chambers but fell within para 206.1 of the Code of Conduct was not thereby ‘authorised’ by the Bar Council to practise as a member of the profession whose members the Bar Council regulated for purposes of s 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; accordingly he was apt to be prosecuted for providing immigration advice or immigration services… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:51 am
R (Aguilar Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe and another intervening); R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1482; [2010] WLR (D) 341 “R 277 of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, which prevented entry clearance to a party to a marriage where one spouse was a United Kingdom citizen and either party was aged under 21 years, was a disproportionate… [read post]
