Search for: "R. S.B. E." Results 41 - 60 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry     CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by Kevin Lashus
S.B. 374 authorizes the Texas Workforce Commission to monitor how the various state agencies sign-up for and implement E-Verify. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
   The May 14 Decision In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Leo E. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:24 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Alabama recently introduced a bill (S.B. 106) which would require notification in the event of a breach affecting the personal information of an Alabama resident. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), says energy is the issue he cares the most about. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:16 pm by Jeff Gittins
(e) Amends section 73-3-16 to remove the requirement that a submission of proof have both a professional engineer stamp and a notary stamp. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Jones
S.B. 202, sponsored by Senator Charles Grassley (R-Ia.), would “expand the use of E-Verify, to hold employers accountable,” among other things. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm by Jeffrey W Toppel
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) had established a likelihood of success that three of the four challenged provisions of S.B. 1070 are preempted by federal immigration law. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Douglas Houser and Susan Cohen serve as editors on this blog, which covers topics that include EB-5, I-539, I-9 compliance, S.B. 1070 and USCIS ELIS. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:12 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(e)  Notwithstanding Section 103.053(c), annuity payments may be reduced by an amount necessary to make the payments required by Subsection (d), and that amount shall be transferred to an appropriate account as provided by the comptroller by rule to fund that coverage. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:25 am by Jeffrey W Toppel
In May 2011, it upheld the Legal Arizona Workers Act, which requires Arizona employers use E-Verify for new employees and imposes significant sanctions on employers that knowingly or intentionally hire unauthorized workers. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Justices considered whether four provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, are preempted by federal law. [read post]